<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Deep Relationships the Only Ones that Count?</title>
	<link>http://www.hardingco.com/blog/2008/05/05/are-deep-relationships-the-only-ones-that-count/</link>
	<description>Ford Harding's Blog on Rainmaking and Business Development</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ford Harding</title>
		<link>http://www.hardingco.com/blog/2008/05/05/are-deep-relationships-the-only-ones-that-count/#comment-6858</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hardingco.com/blog/2008/05/05/are-deep-relationships-the-only-ones-that-count/#comment-6858</guid>
					<description>John:

Granovetter's paper is a classic.  Thanks for the link.

Ford</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John:</p>
<p>Granovetter&#8217;s paper is a classic.  Thanks for the link.</p>
<p>Ford
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Caddell</title>
		<link>http://www.hardingco.com/blog/2008/05/05/are-deep-relationships-the-only-ones-that-count/#comment-6809</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hardingco.com/blog/2008/05/05/are-deep-relationships-the-only-ones-that-count/#comment-6809</guid>
					<description>Sorry, prior link was wrong. The correct one is:
http://netmap.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/granovetter_1983_weak_ties_revisited1.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, prior link was wrong. The correct one is:<br />
<a href="http://netmap.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/granovetter_1983_weak_ties_revisited1.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://netmap.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/granovetter_1983_weak_ties_revisited1.pdf</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Caddell</title>
		<link>http://www.hardingco.com/blog/2008/05/05/are-deep-relationships-the-only-ones-that-count/#comment-6808</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hardingco.com/blog/2008/05/05/are-deep-relationships-the-only-ones-that-count/#comment-6808</guid>
					<description>Ford,

There's literature stating that "weak ties" (i.e., people you don't know so well) can be more valuable in a network than strong ties. The original paper is called "The Strength of Weak Ties" by Mark Granovetter, and I read that it's one of the most cited papers in the world. There's a link to the paper at http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#38;ct=res&#38;cd=2&#38;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnetmap.files.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F05%2Fgranovetter_1983_weak_ties_revisited1.pdf&#38;ei=a34sSO-GEJCg8gSYp6mMBg&#38;usg=AFQjCNEhgJRR7iEEBXOfuHhC5QP488oWew&#38;sig2=ci5_bi2CUYm2L2t72FBXcg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford,</p>
<p>There&#8217;s literature stating that &#8220;weak ties&#8221; (i.e., people you don&#8217;t know so well) can be more valuable in a network than strong ties. The original paper is called &#8220;The Strength of Weak Ties&#8221; by Mark Granovetter, and I read that it&#8217;s one of the most cited papers in the world. There&#8217;s a link to the paper at <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=2&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnetmap.files.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F05%2Fgranovetter_1983_weak_ties_revisited1.pdf&amp;ei=a34sSO-GEJCg8gSYp6mMBg&amp;usg=AFQjCNEhgJRR7iEEBXOfuHhC5QP488oWew&amp;sig2=ci5_bi2CUYm2L2t72FBXcg" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=2&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnetmap.files.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F05%2Fgranovetter_1983_weak_ties_revisited1.pdf&amp;ei=a34sSO-GEJCg8gSYp6mMBg&amp;usg=AFQjCNEhgJRR7iEEBXOfuHhC5QP488oWew&amp;sig2=ci5_bi2CUYm2L2t72FBXcg</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
