<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interesting People 1:  A LinkedIn Heavy User, Part B</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hardingco.com/blog/2009/05/25/interesting-people-1-a-linkedin-heavy-user-part-b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hardingco.com/blog/2009/05/25/interesting-people-1-a-linkedin-heavy-user-part-b/</link>
	<description>Mimi Spangler&#039;s Blog on Rainmaking and Business Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 22:48:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Handal</title>
		<link>http://www.hardingco.com/blog/2009/05/25/interesting-people-1-a-linkedin-heavy-user-part-b/comment-page-1/#comment-28251</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Handal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardingco.com/blog/?p=341#comment-28251</guid>
		<description>Interesting interview. I see this as a hack to turn linkedin into a research tool. But as the guy alluded to, he&#039;s pretty much breaking linkedin&#039;s terms of service. 

I think linkedin is a great tool that allows you to indirectly &quot;ping&quot; your business contacts. Better even than twitter. 

I expect the people who know me to be responsive. If I sent someone an email through linkedin and they didn&#039;t respond. I wouldnt be hap! If a client emailed me an rfp and I didn&#039;t even acknowledge it...that&#039;s a firing offense in my book!

So is this awesome new research tool worth the danger of being unresponsive to the network and reputation you&#039;ve worked so hard to build? That&#039;s for a far braver man than I to figure out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting interview. I see this as a hack to turn linkedin into a research tool. But as the guy alluded to, he&#8217;s pretty much breaking linkedin&#8217;s terms of service. </p>
<p>I think linkedin is a great tool that allows you to indirectly &#8220;ping&#8221; your business contacts. Better even than twitter. </p>
<p>I expect the people who know me to be responsive. If I sent someone an email through linkedin and they didn&#8217;t respond. I wouldnt be hap! If a client emailed me an rfp and I didn&#8217;t even acknowledge it&#8230;that&#8217;s a firing offense in my book!</p>
<p>So is this awesome new research tool worth the danger of being unresponsive to the network and reputation you&#8217;ve worked so hard to build? That&#8217;s for a far braver man than I to figure out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Value of LinkedIn To Recruiters &#124; Beyond - Recruitment Strategists</title>
		<link>http://www.hardingco.com/blog/2009/05/25/interesting-people-1-a-linkedin-heavy-user-part-b/comment-page-1/#comment-28059</link>
		<dc:creator>The Value of LinkedIn To Recruiters &#124; Beyond - Recruitment Strategists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardingco.com/blog/?p=341#comment-28059</guid>
		<description>[...] out the entire interview Parts I and II   var addthis_pub = &#039;frankdilello&#039;; var addthis_language = &#039;en&#039;;var addthis_options = &#039;email, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out the entire interview Parts I and II   var addthis_pub = &#8216;frankdilello&#8217;; var addthis_language = &#8216;en&#8217;;var addthis_options = &#8216;email, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

